Christopher Salmon clearBorder CEO in dark blazer and white shirt against white background

Christopher Salmon

Chief Executive

Executive summary

Trade compliance is a governance issue rather than a back-office function. As export controls, sanctions, customs enforcement, and geopolitical risk intensify, UK businesses are increasingly formalising ownership of international trade compliance through dedicated Trade Compliance Officers and wider governance structures.

Key insights

  1. Trade compliance responsibility also lies with governance, procurement, legal, and operational risk management.
  2. Regulators expect active oversight rather than passive reliance on third parties.
  3. Trade Compliance Officers are – and should be – evolving from administrative coordinators into strategic risk advisors.
  4. Weak ownership of international trade compliance creates financial, operational, and reputational exposure.

As global trade becomes more politically fragmented, and enforcement more aggressive, businesses are increasingly formalising ownership of trade compliance through dedicated Trade Compliance Officers, compliance managers, or wider governance structures.

The key shift is this: trade compliance is no longer simply processing shipments correctly, but more about:

  • Managing commercial risk
  • Ensuring regulatory adherence
  • Protecting operational continuity
  • Creating governance accountability across international trade activity

“Customs enforcement has become more aggressive, and so proactive businesses are formalising the Trade Compliance Officer function as part of wider governance architecture.”

Trade compliance has moved beyond back-office customs administration. For cross-border UK businesses, international trade sits at the intersection of regulatory risk, export controls, procurement, sanctions, supply chain resilience, and corporate governance.

Why this matters

Compliance failures create operational disruption, financial exposure, and governance risk. Businesses trading internationally should ensure clear ownership of export controls, customs compliance, sanctions exposure, and supplier oversight before enforcement issues emerge.

Governance advisory on international trade →

Why UK businesses are appointing dedicated Trade Compliance Officers

For UK businesses trading internationally, compliance exposure is becoming broader, faster-moving, and more commercially significant.

Trade friction is rising globally. Export controls are tightening, sanctions enforcement is expanding, and customs authorities are redoubling scrutiny on origin, valuation, product classification, and supply chain transparency.

“The title of ‘Trade Compliance Officer’ matters less than the underlying shift: businesses increasingly recognise that compliance requires clear ownership.”

Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions are reshaping how businesses think about sourcing, manufacturing, and international expansion. This is particularly true in sectors exposed to:

As a result, many organisations are formalising responsibility for managing all trade compliance matters through dedicated governance roles.

In some businesses, this may take the form of a Trade Compliance Officer. In others, a trade compliance manager, compliance officer, export compliance manager, or wider international trade compliance function may sit within legal, operations, procurement, or governance teams.

Trade compliance is a governance issue, not an operational one

“When responsibility for compliance is fragmented across multiple departments, critical issues can slip between operational gaps.”

The historical model of trade compliance sitting quietly within logistics teams is becoming harder to sustain. It now influences:

  • Financial exposure
  • Supplier relationships
  • Market access
  • Export permissions
  • Procurement
  • Reputation

Legal teams may oversee sanctions. Procurement may introduce supplier risk. Finance may inherit duty exposure. Operations manage shipment disruption. Leadership ultimately carries accountability – as demonstrated by a recent warning issued to Morrisons by HMRC. In that case, supplier claims around limited processing activity were insufficient to establish non-preferential origin.

The lesson is this: trade compliance has become a cross-functional governance issue.

What should a Trade Compliance Officer actually do?

“In mature organisations, the Trade Compliance Officer may act as a strategic advisor to leadership teams.”

The role of a Trade Compliance Officer varies depending on the size, sector, and international footprint of the business. However, most compliance programmes involve responsibility for ensuring adherence to trade laws, customs compliance obligations, export control requirements, and wider regulatory frameworks governing international trade.

This often includes:

  • Implementing trade compliance procedures
  • Managing export control requirements
  • Overseeing customs compliance
  • Monitoring regulatory developments
  • Managing classification and origin processes
  • Supporting sanctions compliance
  • Conducting internal audits and risk reviews
  • Ensuring compliance documentation is maintained
  • Supporting broker and freight oversight
  • Escalating compliance risk internally
  • Coordinating cross-border governance activity

In more mature organisations, the Trade Compliance Officer may also act as a strategic advisor to leadership teams; helping shape decisions around sourcing, market entry, supply chain design, and international expansion.

The commercial risk of weak trade compliance ownership

Many UK businesses are formalising trade compliance programmes internally for two key reasons:

  • Governance expectations are rising
  • Regulators expect visibility, oversight, and accountability

Supplier declarations, freight forwarders, brokers, and intermediaries do not remove responsibility from the importing or exporting business itself.

A common trap some organisations fall into is to treat compliance as a secondary operational issue… until something goes wrong. The financial and operational consequences of weak compliance governance can be significant.

Potential exposure may include:

  • Customs penalties and assessments
  • Shipment delays and trade shocks
  • Export licence breaches
  • Sanctions violations
  • Supply chain interruption
  • Audit failures
  • Reputational damage
  • Loss of customer trust
  • Increased regulatory scrutiny

Increasingly, customs authorities and regulators expect businesses to demonstrate active governance rather than passive reliance on third parties.

Why trade compliance is becoming more strategic

“Tariffs, sanctions, controls, CBAM, origin, and industrial policy are all on the boardroom agenda. This brings Trade Compliance Officers earlier into operational planning and strategic decision-making.”

A major shift underway is that trade compliance increasingly influences commercial strategy itself.

Trade laws now shape decisions around:

  • Supplier selection
  • Manufacturing location
  • Market access
  • Data flows
  • Product design
  • Inventory positioning
  • Customer fulfilment
  • Supply chain resilience

Tariffs, sanctions, export controls, CBAM mechanisms, origin enforcement, and industrial policy are all pushing international trade further onto the boardroom agenda.

Increasingly, this means that Trade Compliance Officers are involved earlier in operational planning and strategic decision-making.

The bigger picture

Taking a wider lens, the direction of travel is clear. International trade has become more political, more regulated, and more operationally complex. Governments are expanding enforcement activity while businesses face growing pressure to demonstrate visibility across supply chains, exports, sourcing, and compliance controls.

“The strongest compliance functions operate as connective infrastructure.”

As a result, trade compliance has evolved from an administrative requirement into a core governance capability. For UK businesses trading internationally, the question is not whether trade compliance deserves ownership, but whether existing governance structures are mature enough to manage the level of regulatory, financial, and operational risk now attached to international trade.

Because – increasingly – trade compliance is a method of protecting a business’s commercial integrity and resilience.

Before you go… what does a ‘good’ Trade Compliance function look like?

Technical regulatory knowledge remains important, but modern trade compliance requires broader commercial capability as well. An effective Trade Compliance Officer would ideally combine:

Regulatory understanding
Interpreting evolving trade laws, export controls, sanctions regimes, and customs requirements in a commercially workable way.

Operational awareness
Understanding how goods, data, suppliers, systems, and logistics move through the business operationally.

Commercial judgement
Compliance influences sourcing, fulfilment, pricing, customer relationships, and market access. Leadership requires commercial as well as technical awareness.

Cross-functional communication
Coordination between procurement, legal, finance, operations, logistics, and leadership teams, particularly where risk ownership is fragmented.

Risk management capability
Identifying, prioritising, escalating, and mitigating operational / regulatory exposure before issues become commercially disruptive.

International trade knowledge
Broad understanding of geopolitical developments, trade policy, sanctions dynamics, and global friction.

Governance discipline
Clear escalation procedures, auditability, documentation standards, and accountability structures.

Practical implementation experience
The strongest compliance programmes are operationally executable. Businesses need governance processes that function effectively inside real commercial environments.

The strongest compliance functions are rarely isolated from the wider business. They operate as connective infrastructure between procurement, operations, legal, logistics, finance, and leadership teams.

Borders For the Boardroom: the clearBorder podcast

Hear more from the clearBorder team on geopolitics, customs compliance, industrial capacity, supply chain risks, and more.

Listen now on Spotify →

Listen now on Apple →

Other interesting reads

Customs compliance

Why compliance and trade audits are a boardroom issue

In this article Hide 01 Executive summary 02 Key insights 03 The end of compliance by assumption 04 Trade audits reveal risk before regulators do 05 More than a compliance […]
Why compliance and trade audits are a boardroom issue
Customs compliance

How post‑clearance audits strengthen global trade compliance

TLDR This article explores the role of post-clearance audits (PCAs) in global trade compliance. It explains what PCAs involve, highlights international standards like WTO TFA Article 7.5 and WCO guidelines, and […]
How post‑clearance audits strengthen global trade compliance
Customs compliance

The “trusted trader” advantage? Why Authorised Economic Operator programmes shape competitive positioning

TLDR By committing to Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) programmes, companies can gain faster border clearance, reduced inspections, and priority treatment. Beyond operational wins though, AEO enhances market access, supports M&A […]
The “trusted trader” advantage? Why Authorised Economic Operator programmes shape competitive positioning
Secret Link